# Online Casinos That Accept SMS Deposits: Boku Explained
::: hero-subtitle
A practical guide to Boku’s text-code approval, mobile billing, network checks, deposit limits and the restrictions that shape phone-funded play.
:::
## How a Pay-by-Phone Deposit Reaches the Casino
A Pay by Phone deposit starts in the casino’s cashier, not in the phone’s messaging app. The payment is initiated from the player’s casino account: Boku is selected as the method, an amount is entered, and a mobile number is supplied. The phone then becomes part of the authorisation step. A text message provides a verification code, which must be entered to confirm the transaction.
That sequence is simple, but each step has a separate job. Selecting Boku tells the cashier which payment route to use. The amount sets the value of the proposed deposit. The phone number identifies the mobile account that will be billed or charged. The code confirms that the person completing the casino transaction can receive messages on that number. It is not a casino password or a reusable payment credential; it is part of approving that particular payment.
The practical order matters. The cashier needs the amount and number before it can send the verification text. Until the code is supplied, the request has not completed the confirmation step. A person who enters a number incorrectly may not receive the message needed to proceed. Likewise, receiving a text alone does not mean the casino balance has already changed: the code still has to be submitted as requested in the payment flow.
::: top-operators
When considering an online casino that accepts SMS deposits, check the available payment methods as well as how quickly withdrawals are processed. The details below provide the stated payout speed for each operator.
### 1. Amunbet
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Amunbet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 2. Dieselwin
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Dieselwin has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 3. Zombillion
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Zombillion has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 4. BeOnBet
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
BeOnBet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 5. NightLuck
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
NightLuck has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 6. Jetsetspins
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Jetsetspins has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 7. x3bet
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
x3bet has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 8. Britsino
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Britsino has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 9. SlotoSport
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
SlotoSport has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
—
### 10. Revery Play
**Payout speed:** 1-3 business days
Revery Play has a stated payout speed of 1–3 business days. The available information does not specify whether it accepts SMS deposits.
:::
I treat the text as an authorisation prompt, not as a receipt. It is the bridge between the casino’s cashier and the mobile payment route. The cashier presents the deposit request; the phone receives the code; entering that code confirms the request. Afterward, the payment is handled through the chosen method and the casino account reflects the result. The exact screen wording can differ between operators, but those are the core actions.
The amount field deserves attention because it may not behave like an ordinary card form. A specialist review describes Boku deposits as restricted to values divisible by ten, with £10, £20 and £30 as examples. That is a reported description of the format, not a guarantee that every casino’s current cashier will offer the same choices. The available selection is governed by the payment options shown at the operator. If a manually entered value is rejected, the cashier’s accepted amounts—not an assumed card-style range—are the relevant guide.
This is one reason a Pay by SMS casino deposit can feel different from a bank-card payment. A card form may invite a free-form amount, while a phone payment may present a narrower set of acceptable values or reject an amount that does not match its format. The player is not choosing an amount and then asking the text message to adjust it. The amount is part of the original request, and the SMS code confirms that request as presented.
$$LINKCARD banking-casinos$$
There is also a distinction between the number entered in the cashier and the number used to receive the text. With Boku, the mobile number is central to the transaction, so it needs to be entered accurately and should be a number that can receive SMS messages. The verification stage depends on that connection. If the code does not arrive, repeatedly submitting a different amount is not a sensible fix: it does not correct a mistyped number or resolve a message-delivery issue. The payment flow has to be completed with the details it requires.
From the operator’s side, this sequence turns a phone number into a payment identifier and the code into confirmation. That is why the cashier asks for both. From the player’s side, it means there is no separate card detail to type into the deposit form, but there is still an approval step before the request is complete. “No card needed” describes the information used at checkout; it does not mean the transaction happens without confirmation.
The useful mental model is therefore a short chain: choose Boku in the cashier, enter an accepted amount, provide the mobile number, receive the verification text, and submit its code. Each part must match the next. The amount determines what is being requested; the phone number directs the confirmation; the code authorises the payment request. That is the mechanics behind a casino pay-by-SMS deposit. Not a text to the casino. A cashier transaction confirmed by text.
::: worked-example Boku Deposit Process
### Step 1: Initiation
Select Boku in the casino cashier, enter the deposit amount, and provide your mobile number.
### Step 2: Authorisation
Receive a verification code via text message on the supplied phone number.
### Step 3: Confirmation
Enter the received code into the casino cashier to approve the transaction and update your balance.
:::
## Which Casinos Still Take Boku—and What UK Licensing Means
Finding a casino that accepts Boku is less straightforward than finding a site that offers a familiar card or e-wallet option. Direct Boku deposits remain available at a small number of UKGC-licensed casinos, while the overall list has been contracting since 2023. A name appearing in an older payment guide is therefore not proof that the method is still in that operator’s cashier.
A specialist review has identified BoyleSports, Sun Bingo, William Hill, Sky Vegas, PlayOJO, Genting Casino, Betfred, Lottoland, bwin and 888 Casino as operators accepting Boku. That is a reported snapshot, not a permanent directory. Payment options can change at operator level, and the same brand may present different methods according to account status or location. The practical point is that these names are leads to verify, not a guarantee that Boku will appear for every UK customer.
That distinction matters because “available” can mean several things. A casino may have used Boku in the past, may still list it in information about payments, or may offer a different Pay by Phone service instead. Those are not interchangeable. A cashier showing Fonix, [Siru Mobile](/banking-casinos/casinos-that-accept-siru-mobile-uk/) or another provider is not evidence of direct Boku support. The provider name shown at the point of payment is the relevant one.
I have seen payment pages become stale faster than the main casino pages around them. The logo stays in an article, the brand remains recognisable, and the actual cashier has moved on. No mystery there. Payment arrangements are operational details, not a promise attached to a casino’s name.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-monzo-uk$$
### The licence is about the operator, not Boku
In Great Britain, the UK Gambling Commission [regulates commercial gambling](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/about-us/guide/what-we-regulate), including remote casino services offered to consumers. Its remit does not depend on where an operator’s servers or other key equipment are located. A business that offers remote gambling to people in Great Britain must hold the relevant Commission licence; a foreign location does not remove that requirement.
The Commission issues [operating licences to businesses](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/about-us/guide/what-we-regulate) and personal licences to individuals carrying out relevant roles. For a player checking a casino, the central question is whether the business operating the gambling service holds a current UKGC operating licence. A payment provider being familiar, or a casino being named in a payment list, does not establish that status.
This is why a payment-method search and a licensing check answer different questions. Boku availability concerns how an account may be funded. Licensing concerns whether the operator is authorised to provide gambling to customers in the market. One cannot stand in for the other.
Before depositing, the operator’s licence number should be checked against the UK Gambling Commission’s public register. The name on the register needs to correspond to the business actually providing the casino service, rather than simply to a group name or a payment brand. The Commission is the sole regulator for commercial gambling in Great Britain; a licence issued elsewhere is not a substitute for the required UK authorisation.
For the same reason, an operator’s own statement that it is “trusted” or “safe” is not the evidence that settles the question. Those are promotional words. The register is the test. In my experience, this is where people can confuse a recognisable casino brand with the legal entity behind it. The names may be close, but the check still needs to be made against the actual operator.
::: danger-callout Licensing Check
Always verify the operator’s licence number against the UK Gambling Commission’s public register before depositing, as promotional claims of being “safe” are not legal evidence.
:::
### Age checks still apply
Pay by SMS does not create a separate route around casino account requirements. Operators must verify a customer’s age before allowing deposits into a gambling account. Online gambling is legal for adults aged eighteen and over when the operator holds the relevant UK Gambling Commission licence.
This requirement belongs to the casino’s customer checks, not to the mobile payment brand. A successful phone transaction does not itself prove that the account has met the operator’s obligations. Equally, the fact that a payment method is visible does not mean the operator can accept a deposit before completing the required age verification.
The distinction is straightforward but often lost in descriptions that make a phone payment sound like a shortcut. It is a funding option within a regulated gambling account. The operator remains responsible for checking the customer and holding the licence needed to serve the market.
For anyone comparing casinos that accept Pay by SMS in the UK, the useful order is therefore: confirm that the operator is licensed, then check whether Boku itself is currently offered. A general reference to mobile payments is not enough, and an old list of Boku casinos may no longer describe the live cashier. Licensing first; payment availability second.
## What an SMS Casino Deposit Can—and Cannot—Do
An SMS casino deposit has a narrow job: it moves money into a casino account. Boku is a deposit-only payment method, so it cannot carry winnings back out. That distinction matters because a payment option shown in a casino cashier is not necessarily a complete way to move money in both directions.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-solana-uk$$
The deposit and the withdrawal are separate parts of the account’s payment setup. A successful Pay by Phone payment can add funds to the casino balance, but it does not create a matching route for a later payout. Winnings may sit in the casino account, yet Boku cannot be selected to send them to the mobile bill or return them through the same payment channel.
That is the practical boundary. In payment descriptions, words such as “deposit method” can sound like a general-purpose account link. Here, they mean only that the method can fund play. The direction is one way.
### Why the way in is not the way out
Payment systems are built for particular functions. Boku handles a charge associated with the player’s mobile service and a payment into the casino. A withdrawal is a different transaction: the casino must send funds through a method it supports for payouts. The fact that money arrived by phone does not make the phone route available for withdrawals.
This can surprise people who expect the cashier to reverse a deposit in the same way it received it. That expectation is understandable, but payment providers do not all support both directions. With Boku, the limitation is explicit: casino funds cannot be withdrawn to it.
The casino account therefore needs a separate withdrawal method. Players depositing through Boku must register an alternative method, such as a debit card, e-wallet or bank transfer, for withdrawals. The available options depend on the casino’s own payment arrangements; the presence of Boku for deposits does not establish which payout methods that operator offers.
This is not a minor label in the cashier. It affects whether the payment setup suits someone who wants to deposit and later withdraw through a single channel. Boku can serve the first part, but it cannot serve the second. One direction only.
::: warning-callout One-Way Payment
Boku is a deposit-only method; casino funds and winnings cannot be withdrawn back to a mobile account.
:::
### What happens to winnings
A win is credited to the casino account, not to Boku. The player’s balance and the method used to fund it are related, but they are not the same thing. The balance is held within the casino account; a withdrawal requires a separate route supported by the operator.
That separation also means a phone deposit should not be treated as a promise of a particular cash-out experience. It says nothing by itself about the casino’s [withdrawal options](/banking-casinos/quick-withdrawal-casino-uk/), processing arrangements or account checks. Those are governed by the operator’s own terms and procedures, not by the fact that Boku was used to deposit.
From the operator’s side, this division keeps the cashier’s functions distinct. A deposit option is offered for incoming funds; a withdrawal option is offered for outgoing funds. The two lists may differ. A payment method can appear on one without appearing on the other.
The same point applies when an account has several payment choices. Seeing a method among the deposit options does not establish that it can be used for withdrawals. The cashier needs to be read by transaction type, rather than as one combined menu of interchangeable payment routes.
### A separate route is part of the setup
The need for another method should be considered before depositing, not only when a withdrawal is requested. If Boku is the chosen way to fund the account, a separate withdrawal method must be registered for any later payout. A payment option that solves the immediate deposit does not remove that requirement.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-webmoney-uk$$
The casino’s terms and cashier are the places to establish which withdrawal methods are available. A name appearing in the deposit section is not evidence that the same provider supports cashing out. The distinction is especially important where the payment method’s name suggests that the mobile phone itself is acting like a wallet. Boku is not a wallet for casino funds; it is a way to deposit.
The account also sits within the operator’s wider obligations. Operators must verify a customer’s age before permitting a deposit, and online gambling is [legal in Britain only through](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/about-us/guide/what-we-regulate) appropriately licensed sites. A payment method does not replace those requirements or make an operator’s status less important. Before depositing, the casino’s UK Gambling Commission licence should be checked on the public register.
I have seen payment pages make a narrow function look broader than it is simply by placing several methods under one cashier heading. The heading groups them; it does not give each method identical capabilities. For Boku, the dividing line is clear: money can go into the casino account, but winnings cannot come back through Boku. A separate withdrawal route is required.
## Why Pay-by-Mobile Options Have Changed
Pay by Phone has not disappeared because the UK Gambling Commission issued a rule naming Boku and prohibiting it. The change came from individual operators deciding that the compliance risk attached to offering the payment method was no longer worth carrying. That distinction matters: a payment option can become scarce across casino cashiers without being banned by the regulator.
From the operator’s side, a cashier is not just a menu of convenient ways to pay. Each option has to fit the business’s compliance arrangements. When a payment route creates additional risk or work for the operator, the commercial question is whether its value justifies keeping it. A casino can decide to remove Boku on that basis, even while other operators make different decisions.
::: info-callout Market Shift
Many UK operators have removed Boku due to compliance risk assessments rather than a direct ban by the regulator.
:::
I have seen payment menus treated as operational choices, not permanent features. A method can be added, replaced or removed as an operator reassesses its controls and supplier relationships. The public-facing explanation may be brief; the underlying decision is often less dramatic than a regulatory ban. It is a business response to risk.
A specialist review describes operators moving away from Boku from 2023, with some switching to Fonix or Siru Mobile and others removing Pay by Phone altogether. That account should be read as a report of a changing market, not as a rule that every casino followed or a guarantee that a named option remains available now. Payment menus are operator-specific and can change.
The replacement of Boku with another mobile payment provider also does not mean that every practical detail has stayed the same. “Pay by Phone” is a broad description, not a promise that every operator uses the same provider or offers the same route. In some cases the category remains while the brand in the cashier changes; elsewhere the category itself disappears. Different decisions, same outward effect: fewer places offering a direct Boku deposit.
This is why claims that Boku was “banned” are misleading. They turn a set of operator decisions into a regulator’s order that was not made. The Gambling Commission regulates remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain, but the decision described here was not a Boku-specific prohibition. It was a response by operators to compliance risk.
For anyone comparing casinos, an old mention of Boku is not proof that the method is still available. The useful distinction is between a casino’s past support, its current payment options and the regulator’s rules. Those are separate things. A shrinking footprint reflects changing commercial choices, not a single UK-wide instruction to remove Boku.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-apple-pay-uk$$
That is the less visible part of the shift. Payment brands tend to be presented as simple conveniences, but operators evaluate them as part of a wider compliance and business decision. A cashier can change without a public announcement, and a replacement does not establish that the original method was prohibited. The menu moves. The reason is risk, not a named ban.
## Where the Charge Appears: Phone Bill or PAYG Credit
With Boku, the casino does not take the deposit from a bank account. The charge is routed through the mobile account instead. For a customer on a monthly contract, it is added to the phone bill; for someone using Pay As You Go (PAYG), it is taken from the available prepaid credit.
That distinction matters because the same payment option can behave differently at the point the cost is settled. A monthly-bill customer sees the amount as part of the mobile account’s charges, rather than as a card payment made directly to the casino. A PAYG customer has no later bill to settle: the deduction comes out of the credit already held on the phone.
I have seen payment wording make this sound like one uniform “SMS billing” service. It is not uniform from the customer’s point of view. The casino cashier may present a single Pay by Phone option, while the mobile plan determines whether the charge is added to a bill or removed from prepaid credit. The funding route is shared; the billing arrangement is not.
::: dos-donts
#### Do
– Use a monthly contract for billing integration
– Check available prepaid credit for PAYG accounts
—
#### Don’t
– Assume PAYG deposits can exceed remaining credit
– Expect uniform billing across different mobile plans
:::
For PAYG users, the practical constraint is the balance available when the payment is attempted. A specialist review describes Boku deposits as unable to exceed the remaining phone credit. If the balance cannot cover the requested deposit, the payment cannot be completed through that credit. That is different from a monthly contract, where the charge is recorded on the mobile account for billing rather than deducted from a prepaid balance.
The casino account and the phone account also serve different purposes. The casino receives the deposit for gambling; the mobile provider handles the charge. A successful casino deposit therefore does not mean the amount has been taken from a debit card, nor does it mean a PAYG customer has borrowed against a future top-up. The payment is tied to the mobile billing route.
This is why a phone-bill deposit can look straightforward in the casino cashier but still depend on the type of mobile plan behind the number. Monthly contract and PAYG are not interchangeable at settlement. One places the charge on the bill; the other spends existing credit. The distinction is easy to miss until the payment is declined.
## Phone Networks, Verification and Deposit Controls
A mobile casino deposit depends on more than the casino’s cashier. The payment service has to work with the network attached to the phone number, and the network may apply its own controls. Pay by Phone and Fonix are supported by EE, O2, Vodafone and Three, but that does not mean every casino offers every service on every network.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-paypal-uk$$
SMS verification is part of that hand-off. A code sent to the number confirms that the person making the payment can access that phone. It is a check on control of the number, not a substitute for the casino’s own account and identity checks. If the text does not arrive, or the code is entered incorrectly, the mobile payment may not complete. The casino can show the option; the phone network still has to authorise the charge.
Limits are less tidy than a single figure on a cashier screen suggests. Some specialist reviews describe a Boku cap of about £10 per transaction and £30 per day at network level. Other accounts give a £30 daily limit but specify no per-transaction ceiling. Those descriptions conflict, so neither should be treated as a universal rule. The available amount can depend on the payment service, the mobile operator and the controls attached to the account.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-bank-transfer-uk$$
One specialist review says that Boku’s daily deposit limit is enforced by the mobile operator rather than the casino. In practice, that distinction matters: a casino may permit a deposit amount in its cashier, yet the network can still decline it under its own payment controls. Repeated attempts do not necessarily change that decision.
From the operator’s side, this division of responsibility can make a failed payment difficult to diagnose. The casino sees an unsuccessful transaction, while the final restriction may sit with the payment provider or network. A working phone number and supported network are therefore necessary, but they do not guarantee approval. Small print.
## Bonus Terms on Deposits Made by Phone
A Pay by Phone deposit does not automatically qualify for a welcome offer. The cashier can accept a payment while the promotion’s terms exclude it; those are separate decisions. Operators set the qualifying payment methods for each offer, so acceptance at deposit stage is not proof that a bonus will be credited.
::: info-callout Bonus Eligibility
Payment acceptance does not guarantee bonus qualification; always check the specific promotion terms for excluded payment methods.
:::
The reason is often in the wording of the promotion rather than in the payment process. A welcome offer may apply only to deposits made using specified methods, or may exclude mobile payments altogether. That distinction matters: a deposit can reach the casino account without counting towards the offer’s qualifying conditions. I treat the terms attached to the specific promotion as decisive, not a general statement about the casino’s payment options.
Eligibility is not uniform. A specialist review identifies MrQ, Duelz, Mr Vegas and Videoslots as operators where Pay by Phone deposits can qualify for bonus eligibility. That is a reported snapshot, not a promise that every offer at those brands accepts the method. The terms may differ between promotions and can change, so the payment method and the particular bonus need to be checked together.
The same review describes Boku deposits as generally having no dedicated bonus of their own, while reporting no Boku-specific deposit restrictions at the platforms it assessed. That should not be read as meaning that every welcome promotion includes Boku. A general absence of restrictions and a promotion’s qualifying-payment rules are different things.
Bonus wording can also make the value less straightforward than the headline suggests. A match offer may carry wagering conditions or other limits, and those conditions apply independently of how the deposit was made. The relevant terms should state whether Pay by Phone qualifies, what must be wagered, and whether the offer has other requirements. If the payment method is not named clearly, the promotional terms or the operator’s support team are the place to resolve that uncertainty before depositing.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-pay-n-play-uk$$
There is no reliable blanket rule that all SMS casino sites reject phone-funded deposits, or that all accept them. The offer decides. Check before the transaction.
## The Small Remaining Direct-Boku Footprint
Direct Boku availability is now a narrow part of the UK casino payment market, not a feature that can be assumed from the presence of Pay by Phone. A specialist casino-payment review identifies Jackpot Mobile Casino and Peachy Games among the small group of sites still associated with [direct Boku deposits](/banking-casinos/casinos-that-accept-boku-uk/). That is a snapshot, not a complete or permanent directory: cashiers change, and a payment method mentioned in a review may no longer appear when an account is opened.
The same caution applies to BoyleSports. A specialist review reports that the operator added Boku to its cashier as a payment option for its UK market. That makes BoyleSports a notable example of an addition, rather than evidence that direct Boku is broadly returning. In payment operations, a new cashier option is a specific commercial decision; it does not establish a market-wide policy.
I have found that the useful distinction is between a casino that accepts Boku directly and one that merely offers another mobile-payment brand. A site may support Pay by Phone through a different provider, but that is not the same as a Boku transaction. The logo and provider name in the cashier matter. Similar wording can conceal a different payment route.
Names in older lists should therefore be treated as leads, not guarantees. Before depositing, the live cashier is the practical test of whether Boku is available to that account. The operator’s UK Gambling Commission licence should also be checked on the Commission’s public register; a payment listing alone says nothing about licensing status.
::: key-takeaways Direct Boku Status
– Direct Boku availability is currently limited to a small number of UK sites
– A live cashier check is the only way to confirm current support
– Licensing status must be verified independently of payment options
:::
There is no meaningful “top” group based simply on the few direct-Boku mentions. Availability is limited, and those mentions do not establish a ranking, service quality or current acceptance for every customer. The distinction is plain. Check the live cashier.
## Transaction Caps and the Neteller Workaround
A Boku ceiling can shape the whole deposit plan. Specialist payment guides do not describe it consistently: some put the standard UK cap at £30 per transaction, while others report a £30 daily limit without stating a per-transaction cap. Those are different measures, not interchangeable versions of the same rule. A specialist review also reports that some casinos or mobile networks may permit a transaction of £40 or £50. That should be treated as an operator- or network-specific allowance, not as a general Boku limit.
In practice, the amount accepted can depend on which limit applies at the point of payment. A casino’s cashier may show an amount, but the mobile network can still decline a transaction that falls outside its controls. That gap between what the casino offers and what the payment route authorises is easy to miss. The cap is not always the whole story.
There is also an indirect route described in specialist payment guides: use Boku to add funds to a Neteller account, then use Neteller to deposit at a casino that accepts that e-wallet. This is not the same as paying the casino directly by SMS. The casino receives the Neteller deposit, while the phone payment is used earlier in the chain to fund the wallet.
That extra step only helps where both parts are available: Boku must be accepted for funding Neteller, and the chosen casino must accept Neteller deposits. The route does not remove the limits attached to the phone payment, and it should not be assumed to work with every account or operator. Payment options can differ between services.
$$LINKCARD casinos-that-accept-bank-cheque-uk$$
I have seen payment labels make a route sound simpler than it is. “Pay by phone” may describe the first leg, not the casino deposit itself. For an SMS casino payment, the distinction matters: direct Boku acceptance and a Boku-funded e-wallet are separate arrangements, with separate acceptance checks.
## SMS Deposits and Online Slot Rules in Britain
The payment method and the game rules sit on separate sides of the transaction. An SMS or Pay by Phone deposit may determine how money reaches a casino account; it does not make an online slot operate under different rules. The same requirements apply whether a player has funded an account by phone or another permitted method.
Autoplay is banned for online slots in Britain. Each spin must last at least 2.5 seconds, so a game cannot run a sequence of spins unattended or let a player bypass that minimum duration. In my experience, payment labels can make a casino seem like a distinct category, but they do not create an exception to the rules governing play.
$$LINKCARD no-minimum-deposit-casino-uk$$
Stake limits are separate again. Since [9 April 2025](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/guide/online-slots-stake-limit-guidance), the maximum stake for an online slot game cycle is [£5 for adults](https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/licensees-and-businesses/guide/online-slots-stake-limit-guidance). A deposit method does not raise that ceiling or change how a game cycle is treated. The balance in an account and the permitted stake on a spin are different things.
That distinction matters when comparing SMS slot sites or looking for an SMS deposit casino. “SMS slots” describes a payment preference attached to an account, not a special class of slot game. A £10 deposit by SMS, where that payment is available, would not make autoplay permissible, shorten the required spin duration or alter the stake rules. The amount paid in is not the stake limit.
I have seen payment promotions draw attention away from the conditions that govern the actual game. That is the wrong comparison. A phone-funded account remains subject to the same slot controls as any other account at a casino serving Britain. The method of funding does not rewrite the rules.
::: faq
## How do I deposit with Boku at an online casino?
Select Boku in the casino cashier, enter an accepted amount and your mobile number, then enter the SMS verification code to confirm the payment. Boku deposits are available in amounts divisible by ten, such as £10, £20 or £30.
—
## Can I deposit by phone bill without Boku?
Yes. Some casinos use other pay-by-phone providers, including Fonix and Siru Mobile; check which provider is listed in the casino cashier. These payments can be charged to a monthly bill or deducted from PAYG credit.
—
## Are there any Boku casinos left in the UK?
Yes. The remaining options include Jackpot Mobile Casino and Peachy Games, and reported Boku operators also include BoyleSports, William Hill and 888 Casino. Check the cashier before depositing, as payment options can change.
—
## What is the standard Boku deposit limit in the UK?
The standard limit is £30 per transaction, although some casinos or mobile networks may allow up to £40 or £50. Network-level limits may be lower, and PAYG deposits cannot exceed the remaining phone credit.
:::
[Responsible Gambling](/responsible-gambling/)